NEWS

It all began with an unexpected call from GVM. Their engineers had observed suddenly high calorific values being measured by Mems' gasQS^TM flonic device. These measurements, however, were about 7% higher than what their simulation software had predicted. The question was clear: Was the device faulty, or was there another explanation?

The experts at Mems were confident that the measurements were accurate. The raw data clearly indicated that gas with a higher calorific value was present in the network. Despite this, GVM remained uncertain, as their models and calculations suggested a lower calorific value. Six hours later, the gas quality suddenly returned to the expected level, and GVM acknowledged that the gasQS flonic had indeed measured correctly.

Two days later, the truth came to light: A French network operator had accidentally introduced high-grade liquefied natural gas into the GVM network. This unexpected input had thrown GVM’s simulations off, but Mems' device had measured accurately. The issue was not a failure of the technology but an unforeseen change in gas quality.

This incident clearly demonstrates that while simulation software is a powerful tool, it has its limitations in unforeseen situations. Accurately modeling a gas distribution network is a complex task that relies heavily on high-quality data. Logical plausibility checks and the strategic deployment of the right measurement instruments at key locations are crucial to successfully managing such challenges.

This success story highlights not only the technical capabilities of the gasQS^TM flonic but also the value of a strong partnership between client and supplier. Thanks to open communication and close cooperation between GVM and Mems, this unique phenomenon was efficiently and successfully resolved.

The trust in measurement data and the professional handling of unexpected events have proven that Mems AG is a reliable partner when it comes to precision and reliability in gas network management.